Can anyone make sense of this metaphor from the Richard Williams on Guardian sports pages:
I can’t work out whether he’s being rude to bloggers or not.
Update: This from Football365:
And sniff he does in his column in this morning’s edition:
Where else? Why the Guardian Unlimited Sport Blog, that’s where.






3 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 12, 2008 at 9:20 am
gia
Actually, in some instances, I might agree with him!
I also suspect it has a bit to do with the fact that print media is losing its audience to the web… and journalists aren’t happy about that. Completely understandable to be honest… couple that with the scores of badly written, badly researched blogs out there and it’s not surprising he’d consider bloggers to be ‘maggots’.
February 12, 2008 at 9:41 am
ourmanwhere
That wasn’t a complaint - more confusion at the metaphor. It was so confusingly written that I wasn’t insure whether he was insulting bloggers or not.
Actually in the entirety of the piece he goes on to praise bloggers’ reactions to “Game 39″ - but it’s in a kind of “who’d a thought it - they can write”, type way.
Rather odd though that it was included in the sport blog section - which is essentially the Guardian trying to promote its writers as bloggers too - while trying to get hip with the whole web 2.0 vibe. Did he even realise he was writing for a blog? Albeit something of a faked one.
February 12, 2008 at 10:03 am
gia
Well, Diablo Cody who wrote Juno was a blogger. Apparently Mason Novick (one of Juno’s producers) loved her blog and encouraged her to get a book done of it. Then said, ‘Hey what about writing a film?’… Couple that with the huge numbers of bloggers who are getting books published and I don’t think anyone can say ‘Bloggers can’t write’ anymore!… unless they spend their time reading Livejournal!