rail bridge newcastle

When I lived in Vietnam it was always a source of severe irritation that I never read one international news report about the country that didn’t mention the war.

Even the ones that tried to highlight the new ‘nam would ultimately have to compare it with its war torn past.

Now back in Newcastle the same can be said.  In today’s Guardian Stuart Jeffries pens a piece that is obviously supposed to reflect the new Tyneside.  In his standfirst he talks of  the area as a a “heartland of culture and science”.  So far so good.

Scan through the article and we get to culture in the 15th paragraph and science in the 21st.  In the meantime we get:

Shearer’s sports bar, Kevin Keegan, collapse of Northern Rock, ham and pease pudding stotties and the over consumption of alcohol. 

In addition he’s done that awful thing of writing Geordie quote in, well, Geordie.  No one ever quoted the Queen as saying “mey hesband and ey.  You’re only ever written up in your own accent if you’re from North of London.

Funny, as I write this, a colleague has come in with a written version of the piece.  It’s a nice spread - slightly ruined by the fact that, although the article references the wider Tyneside, it is about Newcastle - but the cover shot is…Gateshead.

Maybe the designers didn’t know the difference, but I guess we should be pleased that it’s not Newcastle Under Lyme.  It wouldn’t be the first time.

Another point to dwell on:

In the above piece it states:

Not many Toon faithful are prepared to bare their wounds or rehearse their fears before a journalist from London. The representatives of the Toon Army have not responded to my emailed overtures, while Biffa (aka Mike Bolam), who runs the nufc.com fan site and is the author of an excellent book, The Newcastle United Miscellany, declines to be interviewed. He writes: “I’m afraid that I’m still quietly fuming about the recent written antics of the enemy within the Grauniad.”

It’s fair to say that the Guardian is not Newcastle’s favourite paper.  On Tuesday their Fiver mailout started with an (honestly) 70 line pointedly nasty pisstake.  The scornful abuse is daily - and the suggestion is that with at least two of its staffers, Louise Taylor and Barry Glendenning, being committed Sunderland fans there is a genuine bias.

I also receive their Northerner mailer.  It always feels a little sneery and aloof - like way too much of the Guardian’s content when it deals with the North East.  You get the  impression it’s written by Londoners who think that the best way to please is to write as many patronising “northern” stories as possible.  You find yourself looking for the whippet breeding pieces and the fashion spot on flat caps.

As a blogger I can only applaud their website and commitment to all things web 2.0.  But the attitude of their writers to the North East stinks.  If the heartland of the Daily Mail is the Home Counties, the Guardian’s, whatever they might claim about Northern public servants, is London media land luvviedom and they don’t seem to like us much.